Every agent. Every cloud.
One control plane.

SERAA Cortex has four lifecycle modules, and three of the four are adoptable on their own without the rest. Agent Work Bench builds no-code and pro-code agents in one interface, Multi-Agent Orchestration wires them into multi-step workflows on a visual canvas, Agent Registry catalogs and governs them, and Agent Control Tower monitors them in production. Agent Work Bench, Agent Registry, and Agent Control Tower each ship as independent offerings, so you can build without taking the whole suite, govern agents built elsewhere without moving them, or monitor production agents whatever their origin. Covasant reports 70 percent faster time to market for new agents.

Agents deploy from one workflow to GKE, AKS, EKS, or GCP Agent Engine, which is what makes multi-cloud agent orchestration possible without a separate control plane for every cloud. Platform hosting runs on Google Cloud, AWS, or Azure. Single sign-on works with Microsoft Entra ID, GCP IAM, AWS Cognito, SAML, and one account can hold different roles at different scopes.

Yes. Every external tool integration in SERAA Cortex is a standardized Model Context Protocol server, registered centrally in an MCP Hub with its metadata, scope, category, execution logic, inputs, and outputs, then published into the agent canvas for any agent to call. A2A protocol support means agents invoke and coordinate with other agents as sub-agents inside a workflow, including agents hosted on third-party platforms. That is what keeps tool and agent integration auditable and extensible rather than bespoke for every connection.

The Model Hub in SERAA Cortex carries more than 100 large language models across Google, Anthropic, OpenAI, Azure, AWS, and Databricks etc and this keeps getting added as and when new model is available. Multi-Agent Orchestration supports node-wise model selection, so a different model can run at each stage of a workflow rather than one model across the whole pipeline.Covasant reports 40 to 60 percent lower model spend through governed routing.

SERAA Cortex attributes cost by agent, model, user, provider, and tenant, with configurable budget caps on each of them. Every large language model call is written to a searchable log carrying timestamp, status, session ID, agent, model, tokens, and per-call cost, so who ran what and what it cost is one query rather than an investigation across three vendors' invoices. Budget caps sit in the same control plane, so a run that breaches its ceiling can be stopped rather than found later in a monthly bill.

An agent is promoted through Agent Registry's governed promotion workflow, where each environment transition, Dev to QA to Staging to Production, runs through a checklist-driven approval gate that cannot be skipped. When a team requests a promotion, the agent is scored against the applicable promotion policy and must clear a configurable readiness threshold before the promotion can even be submitted. Every requested promotion surfaces in a promotion approvals workspace as one view showing the promotion path, a live readiness percentage, current status, and approver feedback. Checklist items accept mixed evidence: approver sign-offs, file attachments such as security scans, free-text entries such as data classification, and confirmations such as guardrails enabled. The gates are defined centrally as reusable promotion policies, scoped to an organization or project, so the same governance applies to every agent. Agents carry strict semantic versioning of major, minor, and patch, and any version can be diffed against the one before it and reviewed before publishing. An externally built agent registered into the catalog passes the same gates as anything built in SERAA Cortex.

Agent Test Bench within SERAA Cortex simulates Agent conversational interactions against a workflow built from your own historical logs, and execution validation. It profiles your knowledge bases and historical ground truth, clusters semantic intents without manual test-case authoring, synthesizes scenarios across expert, novice, and adversarial personas, and returns a scored baseline on faithfulness, context precision, and task success rate etc.

Access in SERAA Cortex runs on Scope-Based Access Control, using three nested scopes: System for enterprise-wide standards and approved models, Organization for a business unit shaping its own environment, and Project for the specific use case. Assets flow upward, so an agent, knowledge base, or tool stays anchored to the scope that created it and is visible to every scope above. Infrastructure flows downward, so a project can never reach for capability its parent has not granted. SERAA Cortex manages distinct prompts, keys, knowledge bases, and rules per tenant from one control plane.

Yes. Vendor neutrality has become a category qualifier rather than a differentiator, and several platforms now claim it. What varies between them is how much survives a cloud boundary. Every hyperscaler governs well inside its own perimeter, and no cloud provider can sell cross-vendor governance without arguing against its own consolidation case, which is a position rather than a gap in execution. What SERAA Cortex adds is one catalog, one policy engine, and one cost view that hold across four vendor platforms, which is what an audit actually tests.